Oracle’s April patches late….



Oracle released 36 patches in mid-April as part of their quarterly patch cycle…. unfortunately, not all of the patches were released. Apparently they hadn’t finished testing and users were advised to look for the updates around the first of May. Well, guess what – they’re not out yet and the word is that they won’t be until May 15th. This is one example of why I think it’s unwise to say that patches will be released on X date on a regular schedule. They should be releasing them as soon as they have the patch tested and ready.


It’s like Microsoft’s patch cycle. Yesterday was the big day, what if a vulnerability hits today, it would likely be something MS has been notified of, but since it wasn’t widely known they’ve held out. Yes, that sounds cynical, but I can’t count how many times I’ve read people document when they told MS about an issue versus when it was addressed. (Or when it was sort of addressed.) This is one of the things that makes me suspect that many companies still don’t “get it.” Here’s the ideal…. Company is notified of bug in software, it’s supposedly serious. They test and confirm, they figure out how they can fix it with the least “breakage” of other functionality as possible, they start testing. (Perhaps even enlisting the original reporter to test the fix.) The next step MIGHT be wider testing if all goes well. All testing goes well release.

What I’m afraid happens is…. Company is notified of bug in software, supposedly serious. They test and confirm. No public announcement has been made, so it’s put on the list of things to fix. Public announcement is made months later to encourage action. Company scrambles out patch with some in house testing… of course, if no public announcmenet is made then, eventually it rises to the top of the bug list and is patched and then tested and the patch is released during the next patch cycle. All of it trusts that no one else knows about the problem.

The recent (April update) Explorer critical update is an example of a patch that I REALLY wonder how much testing it got. It seems as though there were WIDESPREAD problems with most anyone that had HP easyshare software installed. I don’t recall seeing ANY upfront compatibility warnings, all that I saw came out a few days after the fact.

Of course, if companies didn’t have the “Routine” patch cycle date, then people wouldn’t know when to expect updates. Well, let’s face it we don’t know when to expect zero-day exploits either. Setup a e-mailing list that’s used for software security updates and let them know through that. Then just release them as soon as they’re ready. For that matter, set up an e-mail list for test patches so that they can get wider testing by people that are well-informed of the consequences of testing security patches. I guess where I’ve gone wrong with all of this is that makes it all an open process which most companies don’t want to even think of.

Related Posts

Blog Traffic Exchange Related Posts
  • Microsoft warns against unofficial patch I didn't exactly expect a parade staged by Microsoft for the writer of the unofficial patch for this WMF vulnerability, but.... eweek tells us that Microsoft says "beware of unofficial WMF patch" It also mentions that behind the scenes Microsoft officials are furious that the threat has been overblown. Personally,......
  • Mandriva Linux 2006 Beta 2 According to Mandrivaclub, the second beta in the Release cycle for Mandrive (formerly Mandrake) linux 2006 has been released. Release notes on this beta are available here. Information on the release schedule here in the Mandriva Wiki. Bug reports should be submitted for all those testing it. This is a......
  • Microsoft fixes security fix.... Well, for the second month in a row (I don't recall one in March..) Microsoft has re-released a patch for Windows. This time it's the Flash patch (which really falls under 3rd party software). They've re-worked the version detection of the update in an attempt to solve all the problems......
Blog Traffic Exchange Related Websites
  • What to Look for in Your Blogging Software There are so many choices for blogging software on the market, that it can be very difficult to choose the right one. Every software choice has its advantages and disadvantages which means that you will have to make some decisions on your needs. This will help you to determine which......
  • SAINT 7.9 Product Release From Saint Newletter: Key New Features in SAINT 7.9 Vulnerability Scanner Microsoft Patch Tuesday scan policy - This scan policy checks for the latest published Microsoft Patch Tuesday vulnerabilities (2nd Tuesday of each month) New Vulnerability Check Type Coverage now includes - Blind SQL injection Flash application - Flash application......
  • What If We Didn't Need to Sleep? Everyone wants to add a little more time to their day. What if you could add another eight hours every now and again? Wouldn't that change your life? Of course it would. It may sound like I'm dreaming. There's no possible way we could function without proper sleep, right? It......
PDF24    Send article as PDF   

Similar Posts


See what happened this day in history from either BBC Wikipedia
Search:
Keywords:
Amazon Logo

Comments are closed.


Switch to our mobile site