Microsoft was aware of the WMF vulnerability “for years”



Bugtraq has an interesting post which picks up on a note in Stephen Toulouse’s latest entry on the WMF vulnerability. When I first read the post I was more interested in the way he was responding to allegations of the flaw being an intentional backdoor, but the above bugtraq post points out and makes points on an implication that I missed….. (emphasis is mine…)

“The potential danger of this type of metafile record was
recognized
and some applications (Internet Explorer, notably)
will not process any metafile record of type META_ESCAPE,
the overall type of the SetAbortProc record.”


So, if it’s a potential danger – why hasn’t it been a policy across all applications and not just Internet Explorer?….

Anyway, the post, by Richard M. Smith makes some interesting points…

1. Given the obvious dangers with SetAbortProc records, why
didn’t Microsoft simply disable the feature in the Windows
operating system altogether and come up alternate for
aborting printing of WMF files? Why were all the inadequate
work-arounds in application code pursued instead?

2. How come word about the dangers of the WMF file
format did not make it to the Windows NT, 2000, and XP
development teams as well as the team responsible for
the Picture and FAX viewer?

3. Given the history of problems with WMF files, why
hasn’t support for them been removed from Internet
Explorer? Also shouldn’t WMF files be marked in
the registry as not safe-for-downloading?

What’s worrisome of course, is we KNOW about this one now, I wonder how many things like this are out there that we aren’t yet publicly aware of. This is again, a real problem with the closed source approach, you’re relying on information to stay secret that’s in a product that is widely available… or at least hope that the makers of the product are aware of AND FIX any vulnerabilities before it’s widely known.

What this says to me is that Microsoft, being aware of the “potential danger” COULD have patched this a long time ago. They probably chose not to, as they do with many issues because, it was “not actively being exploited”.

How many other areas does Microsoft see “potential dangers” in that they don’t publicly talking about?

What really gets under my skin about this is finding this out not far on the heels of all the articles that I read about “Windows more secure than Linux” and the ummm…. various interpretations of US-CERT’s vulnerability announcements. I’ve seen the bug reports of many Linux security vulnerabilities, read the mailing list discussions, etc. etc. and by and large when ANYONE says, “you know this….. could be a problem, someone MAY be able to find a way to use this to run code| escalate privilige| crash a system|etc…” it is taken VERY seriously. I can’t think of one security bug that I’ve seen an open source developer say, “well…. no one seems to be exploiting it, so we’ll just leave it there….” They usually do a patch to fix it and move on (after releasing a notice for everyone to step up to the newest maintenance version….) /vent…

Related Posts

Blog Traffic Exchange Related Posts
  • Zotob worm bites big media outlets According to several reports there are several big media outlets seeing what is reported as the zotob worm which exploits a Microsoft Windows vulnerability (MS05-039) disclosed last week. There seems to be no better way for something to make the news than for it to affect the companies that bring......
  • Windows more secure than Linux? For the last week, I've seen various headlines referring to a report from US-CERT that indicated 2005 had 5,198 security flaws reported. Out of those 2,328 were reported for Linux/Unix, 812 for Windows and 2,058 affecting more than one operating system. Now, I'm seeing all sorts of headlines about how......
  • Sunbeltblog on how Microsoft can make a Bloggers day... I've been reading the sunbeltblog lately and they have a post related to this latest virus outbreak which is right to the point. Most corporate desktops run Windows 2000 as opposed to Windows XP and Microsoft has been less than "charming" in their response to the issue that many businesses......
Blog Traffic Exchange Related Websites
  • Professional Blogging Roundup: The Early Veteran's Day Edition We hope you enjoy this latest edition of the Professional Corporate Blogging Roundup. We endeavor to bring new and helpful links to your attention by highlighting them. Here are some links we thought were worthwhile from the past week: Corporate Affiliate Product Reviews presents Blogging for Internet Marketers: How to......
  • Money's 7 New Rules of Financial Security (Part 1) Money Magazine's big headline this month is the 7 New Rules of Financial Security... and Why You Need to Know Them. I have to admit it's a pretty sweet headline - it certainly caught my eye. I flipped right to page 50 to see what I needed to know why.......
  • Understanding the Social Security Claim and Suspend Strategy Personal finance writers and married baby boomers have been talking and thinking a lot about different ways to maximize total Social Security benefits for the married couple. One of the most frequently discussed approaches is the "claim and suspend" strategy. There is a lot of confusion about how this works.......
PDF24    Send article as PDF   

Similar Posts


See what happened this day in history from either BBC Wikipedia
Search:
Keywords:
Amazon Logo

Comments are closed.


Switch to our mobile site