Bugtraq has an interesting post which picks up on a note in Stephen Toulouse’s latest entry on the WMF vulnerability. When I first read the post I was more interested in the way he was responding to allegations of the flaw being an intentional backdoor, but the above bugtraq post points out and makes points on an implication that I missed….. (emphasis is mine…)
“The potential danger of this type of metafile record was
recognized and some applications (Internet Explorer, notably)
will not process any metafile record of type META_ESCAPE,
the overall type of the SetAbortProc record.”
So, if it’s a potential danger – why hasn’t it been a policy across all applications and not just Internet Explorer?….
Anyway, the post, by Richard M. Smith makes some interesting points…
1. Given the obvious dangers with SetAbortProc records, why
didn’t Microsoft simply disable the feature in the Windows
operating system altogether and come up alternate for
aborting printing of WMF files? Why were all the inadequate
work-arounds in application code pursued instead?
2. How come word about the dangers of the WMF file
format did not make it to the Windows NT, 2000, and XP
development teams as well as the team responsible for
the Picture and FAX viewer?
3. Given the history of problems with WMF files, why
hasn’t support for them been removed from Internet
Explorer? Also shouldn’t WMF files be marked in
the registry as not safe-for-downloading?
What’s worrisome of course, is we KNOW about this one now, I wonder how many things like this are out there that we aren’t yet publicly aware of. This is again, a real problem with the closed source approach, you’re relying on information to stay secret that’s in a product that is widely available… or at least hope that the makers of the product are aware of AND FIX any vulnerabilities before it’s widely known.
What this says to me is that Microsoft, being aware of the “potential danger” COULD have patched this a long time ago. They probably chose not to, as they do with many issues because, it was “not actively being exploited”.
How many other areas does Microsoft see “potential dangers” in that they don’t publicly talking about?
What really gets under my skin about this is finding this out not far on the heels of all the articles that I read about “Windows more secure than Linux” and the ummm…. various interpretations of US-CERT’s vulnerability announcements. I’ve seen the bug reports of many Linux security vulnerabilities, read the mailing list discussions, etc. etc. and by and large when ANYONE says, “you know this….. could be a problem, someone MAY be able to find a way to use this to run code| escalate privilige| crash a system|etc…” it is taken VERY seriously. I can’t think of one security bug that I’ve seen an open source developer say, “well…. no one seems to be exploiting it, so we’ll just leave it there….” They usually do a patch to fix it and move on (after releasing a notice for everyone to step up to the newest maintenance version….) /vent…
Related PostsRelated Posts
- Sunbeltblog on how Microsoft can make a Bloggers day... I've been reading the sunbeltblog lately and they have a post related to this latest virus outbreak which is right to the point. Most corporate desktops run Windows 2000 as opposed to Windows XP and Microsoft has been less than "charming" in their response to the issue that many businesses......
- Windows more secure than Linux? For the last week, I've seen various headlines referring to a report from US-CERT that indicated 2005 had 5,198 security flaws reported. Out of those 2,328 were reported for Linux/Unix, 812 for Windows and 2,058 affecting more than one operating system. Now, I'm seeing all sorts of headlines about how......
- WMF exploit situation summary... Since there's been quite a bit of flux the last couple of days I thought I'd try to "reset" the situation and give a general overview of where we stand now with regards to the recent WMF zero-day exploit. 1st there is a vulnerability in the way Windows renders WMF......
- Links: Is Waldo and Harry Potter The Same Person? Ever notice that Where's Waldo and Harry Potter had striking similarities? Both characters were created by British authors, (Waldo is actually the US version of the original Wally). Both were featured in children's books, but had their audience to adults expand to a point where they had sold billions of......
- Points You Will Need To Know Prior To Recording You Are you currently preparing for the first screencast for your on the internet business? It really is okay to be nervous, but don't make it a habit. The much more you function with screencasts the simpler you are going to uncover them. But should you keep these factors in mind......
- The Brilliance of the Izea Kmart Campaign Izea recently ran a promotion for Kmart that would offer influential bloggers a $500 Kmart gift card, if they blogged about their experience at the store. In addition to offering the bloggers gift cards, they also gave them an additional $500 gift card to offer as a prize to one......
- MS responds to “intentional backdoor”, WMF claim
- Exploits a plenty – IE / Excel (Firefox?)
- WMF vulnerability not an accident? Was it an intentional backdoor?
- Microsoft’s unpatched security bugs
- If the cumulitive IE patch fails to install