How much is it worth to you to have a responsive website?



How can I say this…. this is one of the worst ideas I think I’ve heard this week from an ISP. (Maybe in a long time, but I’d have to think on that a few minutes.) An executive at Bellsouth thinks that ISP’s ought to be able to charge certain websites/companies to ensure responsiveness for that ISP’s users. In other words, they would want to charge say… Yahoo $xxxxx to make sure that the yahoo site is faster than the Google site for Bellsouth customers.


Let the shakedown begin!!! IF that’s ever allowed it would be a gold mine for ISP’s and monumentaly bad for online web presence’s. There would be no way that smaller outfits could compete with the kind of money the big sites could throw around and would likely mean big problems for some webhosts. Essentially you’d have to pick and choose which ISP’s you could afford to give this “protection money” to and which you couldn’t (how many users does bellsouth have? Can I afford better to have quicker response for their users or comcast?) That might even lead to a decrease in the international web and increased regionalism since ISP’s in many cases are regional operations.

In his defence he did say that ISP’s shouldn’t be allowed to degrade the performance of a site, that there should be a baseline of service which all sites should enjoy (content providers). My question is who defines the baseline of service? He gave the analogy of picking 2-day vs. 6 day shipping. Is the baseline going to be 500 ms lag unless the ISP is in financial trouble, then that goes up to 5000 ms lag to try and get some money out of more sites. Do sites of a particular political persuasion get dealt with differently than other sites? What about certain Web browsers – maybe it would be possible to identify packet requests from IE vs. Firefox? Windows vs. Apple/Linux/etc.??? This leads us to a bad place I think for most everyone but the service providers and maybe the companies with the deepest pockets.

He claims the following….

Smith said the ability to prioritize traffic would benefit consumers, such as with online services providing medical alerts. And he said his company wants to be able to assure vendors such as online-gaming firms that their subscribers will get top performance even when there is heavy network traffic, which can slow a system.

Smith said BellSouth is especially concerned about new-generation television services it wants to provide via the Internet that would require large amounts of bandwidth.

Allowing it to give priority to TV traffic would ensure that television quality does not decline when other heavy-bandwidth applications are used simultaneously.

The thing is, traffic shaping of a sort already takes place with some ISP’s from what I understand. (A traffic shaper is a network device that prioritizes traffic… for instance Voice over IP packets might get a high priority, mp3 downloads low priority… so Voice over IP is prioritized (quicker) than an mp3 download may be.) I KNOW of some business networks that use traffic shaping and have suspected some ISP’s are doing likewise. I’m not terribly opposed to slightly different priorities for different TYPES of data (voice over ip packets vs. text/web transfers) what disturbs me is saying “this web packet should be handled more quickly than that web packet”. I think that takes us to a place that is too likely to be abused.

Related Posts

Blog Traffic Exchange Related Posts
  • Using ssh to protect web browsing over wireless or other hostile networks This really could be used to encyrpt web traffic over any "hostile" network. Here's what I'm talking about. Laptop using wireless. Within our internal network we would LIKE all our web traffic to be encrypted at least from the laptop to a wired host. (From there to the outside world......
  • Google Reader cache-ing feed behavior In the last couple months I've been "farming out" several domains from the averyjparker.com site. I previously hosted my South Carolina Genealogy, North Carolina Genealogy and Online Radio TV sites all in the same virtual server as averyjparker.com. Well, I've noticed some strange behavior from Google Reader as a result..........
  • The Google Problem, or why I'm starting to use MSN and Yahoo more. This weekend has been a bit of an introspective for me on why google is still the primary search engine I use. I know, I've been a big "fan(?)" of google for quite some time, I've obviously incorporated many of their products into my pages and used Google for 99%......
Blog Traffic Exchange Related Websites
  • 3 Strategies to Gain More Perspectives For Your Videos on YouTube YouTube is a good place to share your video materials with the world and really make some success with the videos. Then again, if you are getting a low number of views from your mpgs than you probably aren't getting much out of it. If you are looking out......
  • Getting Traffic To Your Website Getting traffic to your web address is much more of a challenge than one would think. By using google's search engine, it almost cuts your time in half that you would normally spend not using it. The first priority that you want to accomplish is to submit your site to......
  • ECommerce Internet Site Hosting - Defining Your Requirements The blueprint project reviewWhen you are setting up a web based business selling items or services from your web site you may require eCommerce website hosting. An on-line enterprise has some added requirements but the usual criteria for choosing a hosting service are still relevant, in fact they're of greater......
en.pdf24.org    Send article as PDF   

Similar Posts


See what happened this day in history from either BBC Wikipedia
Search:
Keywords:
Amazon Logo

Leave a Reply

You must be logged in to post a comment.


Switch to our mobile site