Maker tech hub — AI · 3D print · Pi · ESP32 · plus the classic tech archive.

Free ESP32 kit · Books · Network Ninja · Archive

Classic tech archive. From the original averyjparker.com tech blog — historical context; pair with modern guides where noted. Full archive · Maker projects · Network Ninja

Classic tip · Classic

Good writeup on patents and standards

There is a good posting at the zdnet blogs talking about proprietary standards and why they are not a good thing in comparison to open standards. The talk specifically mentions Microsoft Word documen…

Written by

Avery J. Parker

IT veteran, maker educator, and author of Network Ninja, 3D Printing Mastery, and AI Workflow Mastery. Business IT: Diversified Tech Solutions.

There is a good posting at the zdnet blogs talking about proprietary standards and why they are not a good thing in comparison to open standards. The talk specifically mentions Microsoft Word documents as an example of a de facto Proprietary standard and then goes on into a current example with cell phones.



wCDMA is the standard and the patent is owned by Qualcomm. Thhe standard has been adopted by the International Telecommunications Union and so we are stuck as it were. It would be wonderful if one of the requisites for being made a "standard" by any industry consortium were that the standard were not held by one company. I mean, sure there are going to be areas where standards develop due to the market (as was the case with Microsoft Office document formats), but if an organization gets together and decides to make a standard for processing email, wouldn't it be a bad idea if ONE company held the patent for that and was in a position to control the industry because of it?