<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: More WMF exploit testing on Windows 98</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.averyjparker.com/2006/01/01/more-wmf-exploit-testing-on-windows-98/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.averyjparker.com/2006/01/01/more-wmf-exploit-testing-on-windows-98/</link>
	<description>and Internet Security, Windows, Linux, Mac and other Tech Info from Avery J. Parker</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 07 Feb 2011 05:00:13 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: The PC Doctor &#187; Blog Archive &#187; WMF exploit - Quick Guide</title>
		<link>http://www.averyjparker.com/2006/01/01/more-wmf-exploit-testing-on-windows-98/comment-page-1/#comment-78</link>
		<dc:creator>The PC Doctor &#187; Blog Archive &#187; WMF exploit - Quick Guide</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 06 Jan 2006 10:35:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.averyjparker.com/2006/01/01/more-wmf-exploit-testing-on-windows-98/#comment-78</guid>
		<description>[...] Further research seems to show that Windows 98, Windows 98 SE and Windows ME might be harder to infect&#160; than later versions&#160;, although they still contain the exploit and may be targeted with greater ferocity soon. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><!-- google_ad_section_start --><br />
<!--INFOLINKS_ON--></p>
<p>[...] Further research seems to show that Windows 98, Windows 98 SE and Windows ME might be harder to infect&nbsp; than later versions&nbsp;, although they still contain the exploit and may be targeted with greater ferocity soon. [...]<br />
<!--INFOLINKS_OFF--><br />
<!-- google_ad_section_end --></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The PC Doctor</title>
		<link>http://www.averyjparker.com/2006/01/01/more-wmf-exploit-testing-on-windows-98/comment-page-1/#comment-67</link>
		<dc:creator>The PC Doctor</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 Jan 2006 11:48:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.averyjparker.com/2006/01/01/more-wmf-exploit-testing-on-windows-98/#comment-67</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;Much more on the WMF exploit&lt;/strong&gt;

	A lot has happened since last night so let me try to bring you up to speed on things.
	First, Ilfak Guilfanov&#160; (the researcher who came up with the unofficial patch) has come out with a WMF vulnerability checker to allow you to test your systems ...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><!-- google_ad_section_start --><br />
<!--INFOLINKS_ON--></p>
<p><strong>Much more on the WMF exploit</strong></p>
<p>	A lot has happened since last night so let me try to bring you up to speed on things.<br />
	First, Ilfak Guilfanov&nbsp; (the researcher who came up with the unofficial patch) has come out with a WMF vulnerability checker to allow you to test your systems &#8230;<br />
<!--INFOLINKS_OFF--><br />
<!-- google_ad_section_end --></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

