<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Another workaround for the 0-day WMF Exploit</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.averyjparker.com/2005/12/29/another-workaround-for-the-0-day-wmf-exploit/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.averyjparker.com/2005/12/29/another-workaround-for-the-0-day-wmf-exploit/</link>
	<description>and Internet Security, Windows, Linux, Mac and other Tech Info from Avery J. Parker</description>
	<pubDate>Mon, 01 Dec 2008 23:26:57 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.5</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Spyware Informer</title>
		<link>http://www.averyjparker.com/2005/12/29/another-workaround-for-the-0-day-wmf-exploit/#comment-63</link>
		<dc:creator>Spyware Informer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 31 Dec 2005 01:14:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.averyjparker.com/2005/12/29/another-workaround-for-the-0-day-wmf-exploit/#comment-63</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;The Zero-Day Exploit&lt;/strong&gt;

The new WMF exploit been all over the news lately. Why shouldn't it be? It's a huge security risk! How so? For one, it exploits a feature that almost every Windows PC has: a graphics rendering engine. I'm sure that many of you know what this is and ...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><!-- google_ad_section_start --><br />
<strong>The Zero-Day Exploit</strong></p>
<p>The new WMF exploit been all over the news lately. Why shouldn&#8217;t it be? It&#8217;s a huge security risk! How so? For one, it exploits a feature that almost every Windows PC has: a graphics rendering engine. I&#8217;m sure that many of you know what this is and &#8230;<!-- google_ad_section_end --></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
